My Interview with Andrei


Andrei Mihailiuk is a 2nd year MA student at UBC and for his digital humanities project this spring, he created an interactive map of the theorized routes of the Roman Triumphal Procession. Take it away, Andrei.


As always, let’s start with a brief description of your project.

My project is a database-in-progress recording the ancient literary references, archaeological traces and modern scholarly reconstructions of the Roman triumphal procession. The website takes the form of an interactive map of ancient Rome, derived from Platner and Ashby’s now-public domain Topographical Dictionary of Ancient Rome (1929), which allows users to compare the evidence with the various reconstructions.


What lead you to this particular topic? Did you have a prior interest in the subject or did you choose the topic based on what could best be presented digitally?

I knew from the get-go that I wanted to create some sort of digital map for my project.  As for the subject, I was initially attracted to the Roman triumph after reading Diane Favro’s fantastic article “The Street Triumphant”, which discusses the ways in which wealthy Roman patrons implicated themselves with Rome’s military narrative through their building projects along the triumphal route. One problem, alluded to in the article, is that the route of the procession is hazy, broken and contested.

What resources did you use? Did you have prior knowledge of these resources?

In the end, I used the site hosting server Wix, and an interactive mapping program called MapsAlive. While I had some rudimentary previous experience with site hosting servers using WordPress, I had never used either of these programs before.

What was the most challenging aspect of the project?

Perhaps the most challenging part of the project was cementing what exactly I wanted to do, and finding the corresponding toolset through which to accomplish it. My initial plans for the project were far more abstract, and were something to the effect of creating a map that conveyed the geographical and chronological expanse that the Roman triumphal procession condensed and narrativized in its route. This required a toolset that would allow not just hotspots with popup information, but the ability to zoom out and in over incredible resolutions. Simply put, such a program did not exist in my budget range. As my goals became far more modest – and arguably more fruitful – I finally came upon a program that could display exactly the information I wanted to display. The limitations of your presentation medium in effect become the limitations of your project.

What was the most enjoyable aspect of the project?

There is no greater joy in learning how a new toy works and taking the first steps to make it bend to your will. Coding JavaScript for MapsAlive was a unique kind of high, at least after the initial few hours of confusion and frustration.

Would you undertake a similar project again, now that you are familiar with the process?

Now that I have a basic knowledge of coding, and a deep understanding of this particular mapping program, I would absolutely undertake similar mapping projects, though perhaps with different research goals – just to see what other data can be effectively displayed in this medium.

Do you intent to maintain the site you created, or add content in the future?

I most certainly intend to maintain my website, and have even taken steps towards communicating with other scholars who have done work on the triumphal procession. Currently I feel that the archaeological aspects of this topic are underrepresented, and so I want more input from Roman urban archaeologists in particular.


Do you think this project was an effective way to study/teach about your topic?

Given that the top-down perspective of visualizing space has been favoured by humankind for thousands of years, I am confident that my two-dimensional map is an effective first step in highlighting some of scholarly problems surrounding the triumphal route. The ability to see how scant the evidence of the route is in direct comparison with the leaps in logic that scholars take in order to fill in the gaps, I feel, should incite a more careful and critical look at how we reconstruct the past, and should even bring the most fruitful methodologies to light.

Any final thoughts or comments?

Woo questionnaires!

Just for fun:

What is your favorite word?


What is your least favorite word?


What turns you on?

Certain eye movements

What turns you off?

Feet, in all forms

What sound or noise do you love?

That stock foley sound of someone typing on a computer keyboard

What sound or noise do you hate?

Squeaky brakes

What is your favorite curse word?

A close tie between fucknuggets and fuckdoodles

What profession other than your own would you like to attempt?

Foley artist; session musician; career fop

What profession would you not like to do?

Surgeon; real estate agent; chartered accountant; any desk job

If heaven exists, what would you like to hear God say when you arrive at the pearly gates?

So…what’d you think?

About Lisa Tweten

As one of the project mangers, Lisa is the heart of the project. She works with Digital Humanities to photograph the MacGregor squeeze collection.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.